Home > PAM BONDI
137 views 6 min 0 Comment

DOJ Sues Arizona, Connecticut For Failing To Hand Over Voter Rolls

Tevin McLeod - January 8, 2026


Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) said on Jan. 6 that it is suing Arizona and Connecticut for allegedly failing to turn over their full voter registration rolls for federal inspection.

Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks at a press conference in Washington on Dec. 4, 2025. Madalina Kilroy/The Epoch Times

The two new federal lawsuits, which say the two states are hindering federal oversight that is intended to stop election fraud and ensure voter lists accuracy, bring the department’s nationwide total to 23 states plus the District of Columbia.

Before the most recent lawsuits were filed, the DOJ on Dec. 18, 2025, filed lawsuits against Georgia, Illinois, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia, alleging they failed to produce voter registration lists upon request. Earlier the same month, the DOJ filed similar lawsuits against Delaware, Maryland, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington state, also for allegedly not producing the lists upon request.

U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said on Jan. 6 that the DOJ will continue to file lawsuits “to protect American elections.”

“Accurate voter rolls are the foundation of election integrity, and any state that fails to meet this basic obligation of transparency can expect to see us in court,” Bondi said in a statement.

Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division added the department “is committed to safeguarding fair and free elections, and will hold states accountable when they refuse to respect our federal elections laws.”

The lawsuits state that the U.S. attorney general is responsible for enforcing the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act, which Congress passed to make sure states have effective voter registration and voter list maintenance programs. The U.S. attorney general also enforces the Civil Rights Act of 1960, which allows her to demand that states produce statewide voter registration lists.

The Arizona lawsuit states that Bondi asked Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes in July 2025 to produce a copy of his state’s voter registration list within 14 days.

Fontes responded, saying he could not comply with the 14-day deadline, and Bondi gave him an extension to September 2025. Two weeks before the new deadline, Fontes informed Bondi that he could not comply because doing so would violate state and federal privacy laws, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit alleges Fontes’s refusal to produce the requested records violates the information-production provisions of the Civil Rights Act. The lawsuit asks the court to order Fontes to produce the records.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes told The Epoch Times that “Arizonans’ private voter registration information is not up for grabs.”

“Both state and federal law prohibit the unrestricted release of Arizona’s complete voter registration database to the DOJ,” she said. “My office will continue to work with the Secretary of State to defend the private data of Arizona voters and safeguard our independent election systems.”

Fontes said in a statement on Dec. 19, 2025, that he declined to hand over the voter rolls to the DOJ out of voter privacy concerns.

“Arizona voters also have important privacy rights that cannot be infringed because they choose to exercise their constitutionally protected voting rights,” he said.

The Connecticut lawsuit states that in August 2025 Bondi asked Secretary of State Stephanie Thomas to produce the state’s voter registration list. Thomas handed over some of the requested data and said more data would follow, but she did not send more information.

Bondi sent a letter in December 2025 demanding the list. Later that month, Thomas responded, saying that she could not comply because Connecticut law forbids her from releasing the information sought.

The lawsuit says that Thomas’s failure to hand over the list violates the information-production provisions of the Civil Rights Act, and asks the court to compel Thomas to do so.

Thomas said she was not surprised that Connecticut has been “added to the long list of states being sued on these grounds.”

She told The Epoch Times that as secretary of state, her “foremost responsibility” is to Connecticut voters “who entrust the state and their local election officials with sensitive data so they can participate in our representative democracy without fear that their information will be misused or exposed.”

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said that Connecticut obeys federal laws and that he was disappointed that his state is being sued.

“We tried to work cooperatively with DOJ to understand the basis for their request for our voters’ sensitive personal information. Rather than communicating productively with us, they rushed to sue,” Tong told The Epoch Times.

Loading recommendations…



Source link

Post Views: 140

PREVIOUS

Ringleader of $250M Minnesota welfare fraud scandal ordered by judge to forfeit Porsche and luxury goods

NEXT

Ranking Member Robert Garcia, All Oversight Democrats, Demand Pam Bondi Testify to Oversight Committee as DOJ Violates Epstein Files Transparency Act and Oversight Committee Subpoena – House Oversight Democrats (.gov)
Related Post
September 8, 2025
US President Donald Trump, flanked by Attorney General Pam Bondi (L) and his granddaughter Arabella Kushner (R) attends the US Open men's singles final – IslanderNews.com
December 18, 2025
Australian Counterterrorism Unit Rams Car, Arrests Five Men Suspected Of Planning Violence
February 16, 2026
Attorney General Pam Bondi Claims All Epstein Files Documents Now Released, Publishes List of ‘Government Officials & Politically Exposed Persons’ – Just Jared
March 23, 2026
Donald Trump Admin Suffers Legal Blow Over Election Records Seized By FBI
Comments are closed.
John Michael Chambers

DISCLAIMER

The material contained on this website represents the opinion, analysis and/or commentary of JMC, John Michael Chambers and its aggregated content and resources, and is intended to provide the viewer with general information only and nothing should be considered as providing medical, financial, or other advice. JMC, John Michael Chambers strives to deliver wartime updates and opinion commentary that empowers and informs viewers. JMC, John Michael Chambers is dedicated to the rule of law and upholding the U.S. Constitution and does not endorse violence or discrimination in any form. This is NOT an official government or military website. This is not a news network.

© 2026 John Michael Chambers All rights reserved.