Donate… Help us keep exposing the hacks hiding behind fancy titles.
Sign up for our email list… Get the stories the regime media won’t touch, with the receipts sent straight to your inbox.
Biden did Ketanji Brown Jackson no favors when he turned his Supreme Court search into a DEI political identity box-checking exercise.
He could’ve picked any number of remarkable legal minds and let the nominee stand on the strength of his or her record. Instead, in perfect DEI fashion, he announced the race-and-gender first, because that’s how Dems do business these days. They take an institution like the highest Court in the land, a place that’s supposed to be serious, and turn it into a three-ring circus with performers who are in over their heads.
And that’s the problem with Justice Jackson. It’s not just that she’s a radical liberal. The issue is that she keeps handing all her critics a lot of material by sounding confused, overly emotional, or totally unprepared.
Her latest (goofy) dissent in the Louisiana redistricting fight was a perfect example of this.
The Court had already said the current map was unconstitutional. So that meant Louisiana couldn’t keep using it as-is. And because the election calendar is coming up quick, Louisiana asked the Court to speed things up so the state could get a legal and constitutional map in place before voters head to the polls.
But Justice Jackson pushed back. She wanted to slow down the process, so Louisiana would be stuck using a map the Court had already rejected and called “unconstitutional.” Why on earth does a Supreme Court Justice want a state to use an illegal map? Well, we actually do know why…don’t we?
And that’s why Alito came down so hard on her. He said her reasons for delaying the process were weak, and he took issue with her accusing the majority of acting in a political or reckless way… because after all, wasn’t that precisely what she was doing?
The issue wasn’t whether the Court liked one party more than another. Louisiana needed a lawful map in place for the upcoming election, and the Court had already ruled that the previous map wouldn’t work. Jackson wanted to delay the judgment anyway, and Alito and Thomas clearly weren’t having it.
Eric Daugherty:
🚨 HOLY CRAP!! Justices Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas just PUMMELED Ketanji Jackson’s dissent, calling it “trivial at best, and the other is baseless and INSULTING”
🔥🔥
Jackson basically ATTACKED the majority, and argued Louisiana should be required to use an *unconstitutional* racially gerrymandered map in the 2026 midterms — directly against the majority ruling.
Alito didn’t take too kindly to that:
“The dissent goes on to claim that our decision represents an unprincipled use of power…that is a groundless and utterly irresponsible charge.”
“What principle has the Court violated? The principle that Rule 45.3’s 32-day default period should never be shortened even when there is good reason to do so? The principle that we should never take any action that might unjustifiably be criticized as partisan?”
“The dissent accuses the Court of ‘unshackl[ing] itself from ‘constraints…’ It is the DISSENT’S rhetoric that lacks restraint.”
“The dissent in this suit levels charges that cannot go unanswered. The dissent would require that the 2026 congressional elections in Louisiana be held under a map that has been held to be unconstitutional.”
“The dissent does not claim that it is now too late for the state legislature or the District Court to adopt a new map that complies with the Constitution.”
“Nor does the dissent assert that it is not feasible for the elections to be held under such a map. Instead, the dissent offers two reasons for its proposed course of action.”
“One is trivial at best, and the other is baseless and insulting.”
Gorsuch signed onto this as well.
🚨 HOLY CRAP!! Justices Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas just PUMMELED Ketanji Jackson’s dissent, calling it “trivial at best, and the other is baseless and INSULTING”
🔥🔥
Jackson basically ATTACKED the majority, and argued Louisiana should be required to use an… https://t.co/AEWDA1DM0h pic.twitter.com/eZVwRDMwCe
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 4, 2026
That’s about as close to a Supreme Court spanking as you can get.
This is the Supreme Court. Every word carries weight. And when a justice writes a dissent that gets smacked down this hard by three members of the Court, it raises the same questions Americans have been asking for a while: is Jackson really operating at the level this job demands?
No. She’s not, and we all know it.
This isn’t the first time Jackson has given Americans a reason to wonder about her abilities.
One of those moments came during the birthright citizenship debate, where she tried to make a point about allegiance by comparing it to stealing a wallet in Japan… she humiliated herself in front of President Trump, who was observing the arguments.
Tony Seruga:
DEI Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson EMBARRASSES Herself In Front Of President Trump🤡
“If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it’s allegiance.”
Since Biden wasn’t even mentally present and her appointment was done with the autopen, maybe this idiot can be removed from the court?
DEI Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson EMBARRASSES Herself In Front Of President Trump🤡
“If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it’s allegiance.”
Since Biden wasn’t even mentally present and her appointment was done with the autopen, maybe… pic.twitter.com/Q5xwUuH0dy
— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) April 1, 2026
And like so many other judges in this country, many believe that Jackson is more like a puppet. She’s a radical in a robe who will do what she’s told and won’t ask questions.
This is Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson previously appearing in a ‘queer’ Broadway production of ‘& Juliet.’
Today in the Supreme Court she was called out for “extreme” dissent for ruling against the landmark birthright citizenship case. pic.twitter.com/jgFWXRLLHB
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) June 27, 2025
The Supreme Court is supposed to be the grown-up in the room. It’s where the hardest constitutional questions in the country go for clarity, and the justices are expected to cut through emotion, politics, and noise and deliver brilliance. Jackson doesn’t pull that off. Most of the time it feels like she’s desperately reaching for a point instead of actually landing one.
Biden could’ve chosen someone so sharp that any “identity politics” argument would’ve never been brought up. Instead, he turned the nomination into a political virtue signal and a DEI disaster… and once again, it’s the American people who will suffer.
Donate… Help us keep exposing the hacks hiding behind fancy titles.
Sign up for our email list… Get the stories the regime media won’t touch, with the receipts sent straight to your inbox.
NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL — BLUESKY
