For decades, conservatives have argued that one of America’s biggest immigration loopholes has been hiding in plain sight.
Every election cycle, politicians promise to secure the border. Yet one policy critics say continues to encourage illegal immigration has remained largely untouched, despite years of public frustration and repeated legal battles.
Advertisement
Now, after a major Supreme Court setback, Republican leaders say the fight is not over.
In fact, they believe it may be entering its most consequential phase yet.
Speaking on Fox News, Johnson said Republicans are actively examining every available option to restore what they believe was the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Advertisement
“I really enjoyed Justice Clarence Thomas’ dissent. Everybody should read that,” Johnson said.
“He explained that the 14th Amendment, the original intent, was to enhance and really value citizenship, and it’s been devalued because of birthright tourism, which is what we have now.”
“It’s a threat to the rule of law and national security.”
Advertisement
“We do need to address it. We’re looking at all angles. If there’s some legislative fix, we’ll advance that immediately.”
Johnson’s comments come just days after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against the Trump administration’s effort to end automatic birthright citizenship through executive action.
The majority held that children born on U.S. soil remain citizens regardless of their parents’ immigration status, relying on more than a century of legal precedent dating back to the Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark.
President Trump immediately called on Congress to act.
“The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation,” Trump wrote on Truth Social after the ruling.
The president argued that lawmakers should begin work immediately, insisting that “no long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary.”
Johnson echoed that urgency, saying House Republicans are evaluating every possible legislative avenue.
Conservatives argue that birthright citizenship has evolved far beyond what the Reconstruction Congress intended when it adopted the Fourteenth Amendment after the Civil War.
They point to the amendment’s language granting citizenship to those “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, arguing that phrase was never intended to include the children of illegal immigrants or temporary visitors.
🚨 IT’S OFFICIAL: Speaker Johnson announces he’s coming up with legislation to STRIKE DOWN rampant birthright citizenship and tourism scams for illegal aliens
GOOD! Act fast!
“I really enjoyed Justice Clarence Thomas’ dissent, everybody should read that. And he explained that… pic.twitter.com/GT2z3kgeV6
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 5, 2026
Justice Clarence Thomas made that case forcefully in his dissent.
“I am not sure that today’s opinion will stand the test of time,” Thomas wrote.
Advertisement
“The Citizenship Clause added greatly to the dignity and glory of American citizenship. Today’s opinion devalues that citizenship.”
Justice Samuel Alito also dissented, arguing that the Court’s modern interpretation extends well beyond the original public understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Supporters of reform argue the current system has created a powerful incentive for illegal immigration and birth tourism, with foreign nationals traveling to the United States specifically so their children will automatically receive American citizenship.
Republicans contend that those practices undermine both immigration enforcement and the value of citizenship itself.
The debate now shifts from the courts to Congress.
Some Republicans believe legislation redefining who is “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States could survive judicial review.
Others believe a constitutional amendment would ultimately be required, though that path would demand overwhelming support in both Congress and the states.
Regardless of the legal route, Johnson’s remarks make one thing clear: House Republicans are not treating the Supreme Court’s decision as the final word.
Instead, they view it as the beginning of a new legislative battle over one of the most consequential immigration issues in modern American politics.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.
