Home > PULSE OF THE NATION
33 views 5 min 0 Comment

Backlash from MAHA influencers and podcasters over glyphosate is loud, but they still stop short of breaking with Trump

- March 30, 2026


Backlash from “Make America Healthy Again” influencers and right-leaning podcasters over the Trump administration’s February 18 executive order boosting domestic glyphosate production — the herbicide used in Roundup and widely identified by scientists as a carcinogen — has been loud and, at times, profane. But even when the policy is described as a betrayal, criticism is rarely directed at President Donald Trump or Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., instead being redirected in ways that preserve alignment with the administration.

During the March 23 episode of The Shawn Ryan Show, right-leaning podcast host Shawn Ryan expressed deep frustration with the executive order, saying, “Thank you, Trump. Thank you, RFK. Good fucking job. Way to fucking stick to your constituents.” 

“Every fucking thing that came out of these guys’ mouth is a fucking lie,” Ryan continued. “It makes me think, what is the fucking point of voting?” 

He reiterated his frustration during the March 26 episode, questioning the administration’s national security rationale for the order. 

Ryan’s anger stands out because he directly assigns responsibility to Trump and Kennedy for the administration’s actions on glyphosate. But across the Make America Healthy Again movement, backlash to the order has largely followed a different pattern: Among right-leaning influencers and podcasters, criticism is severe, but responsibility is redirected away from Trump and Kennedy.

This dynamic isn’t new. MAHA influencers have repeatedly expressed outrage over the administration’s pesticide policy while failing to hold Trump or Kennedy accountable. Moms Across America founder Zen Honeycutt called the order “an egregious offense” and “a betrayal,” while adding that “Bobby is not in charge of Trump.” Food activist Vani Hari described “a level of anger and frustration like I’ve never witnessed before,” but noted, “Secretary Kennedy has done everything he said he’s going to do.” In February, podcaster Joe Rogan complained about glyphosate’s harms without directly referencing the administration’s role in expanding its use.

The pattern became especially clear across multiple shows more recently. During the March 19 episode of Critically Thinking with Dr. T and Dr. P, Honeycutt said Trump’s glyphosate executive order “made me sick to my stomach,” called it “outrageous,” and said it was “an F-you to the MAHA movement.” But even as she condemned the policy, Honeycutt framed it as the product of pressure on Trump rather than a decision he owns. She pointed to chemical companies and people in his orbit, suggested he had been influenced or coerced, and ultimately returned to a message about consumer pressure and farmers choosing not to use glyphosate.

The same pattern reappeared on Rogan’s podcast that week. During the March 19 episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, Rogan acknowledged that “Trump passed an executive order” blocking efforts to restrict glyphosate use, but did not directly criticize him. Instead, he returned to familiar warnings about glyphosate, suggesting long-term exposure “can’t be good.” 

During a March 20 appearance on American Thought Leaders, actor and MAHA supporter Rob Schneider criticized the administration’s move on glyphosate more directly. He said he was “very much angry” about the policy and accused the administration of giving Bayer protection for a “known cancer-causing agent.” But Schneider did not treat that anger as reason to break with Trump. Instead, he pointed to “captured agencies,” corporate influence, and a political system shaped by corporate power, while also describing himself as “a big fan of this administration.”

Across most of these examples, the criticism is severe, but responsibility is displaced, preserving alignment despite direct policy conflict. The policy can be described as dangerous — or even a “betrayal” — but the decision is attributed to external pressure, institutional capture, or surrounding actors rather than Trump himself.

The result is a movement willing to call the policy a betrayal without fully treating it as one.





Source link

Post Views: 38

PREVIOUS

RFK Jr.’s Offal Advice | Defector

NEXT

Ranking The Kennedy Women’s Best Wedding Dresses By Timeless Appeal
Related Post
April 20, 2025
Trump admin continues releasing information to paint Abrego Garcia as violent gang member as outcry against deportation grows
April 14, 2025
DOJ charges man in arson attacks on Tesla showroom, Republican HQ in New Mexico – NBC10 Philadelphia
August 29, 2025
RFK Jr. is a shaky leader for much-needed public-health reform
March 19, 2025
Truckers being stopped for English test
Comments are closed.
John Michael Chambers

DISCLAIMER

The material contained on this website represents the opinion, analysis and/or commentary of JMC, John Michael Chambers and its aggregated content and resources, and is intended to provide the viewer with general information only and nothing should be considered as providing medical, financial, or other advice. JMC, John Michael Chambers strives to deliver wartime updates and opinion commentary that empowers and informs viewers. JMC, John Michael Chambers is dedicated to the rule of law and upholding the U.S. Constitution and does not endorse violence or discrimination in any form. This is NOT an official government or military website. This is not a news network.

© 2026 John Michael Chambers All rights reserved.