Nearly a month after a surprising announcement sent shockwaves through California politics, many of the biggest questions surrounding one of the nation’s highest-profile governors remain unanswered.
Instead of bringing clarity, the weeks that followed have produced new questions about legal representation, financial disclosures and the scope of a federal investigation that Newsom himself says is targeting those closest to him.
Advertisement
California Gov. Gavin Newsom says he and First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom remain under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice, while critics continue pressing for additional information about the probe and the governor’s financial disclosures.
Newsom first announced the investigation in June, claiming federal agents had contacted family members, friends, and former employees in what he characterized as a politically motivated effort.
Advertisement
“Federal agents have knocked on the doors of family, friends, and former employees, not because they found a crime, but because they’re simply trying to find one,” Newsom said at the time.
He also alleged investigators were demanding records and abusing the grand jury process, although he did not identify the individuals contacted or specify what records were being sought.
According to Townhall Media, sources familiar with the matter have claimed there are multiple federal investigations that began during the Biden administration, including at least one reportedly involving Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s taxes and nonprofit organizations.
Those claims have not been independently confirmed by the Department of Justice, which does not typically comment on ongoing investigations.
Since making his announcement, Newsom has confirmed that he and his wife have retained private legal counsel, although he has declined to identify the attorney representing them.
During a recent press conference, Newsom was also questioned about his tax returns from 2021 through 2025 after his office previously indicated they were being prepared for public release.
“I already have. I’ve given 20 years of my taxes,” Newsom responded before comparing his record to President Donald Trump’s.
When asked why the more recent returns had not yet been released, Newsom replied that reporters would receive the new tax returns and said he had “no problem” making them public.
Critics, however, argue those returns have still not been released.
According to previous reporting, Newsom publicly released complete tax returns covering the 2017 through 2020 tax years during his 2022 reelection campaign, when state law required candidates for governor to disclose their most recent tax returns.
Newsom has also said that federal agents have contacted individuals close to him, prompting some of them to hire private attorneys.
“The abuse was overwhelming,” Newsom said.
“Poor and innocent people getting knocks on the door first thing in the morning, having to hire private attorneys. Lives and reputation at risk for no other reason than they want to take me out.”
Newsom has not publicly identified those individuals.
Separate reporting has suggested one federal investigation may have connections to the broader corruption and tax fraud case involving former California officials and political operatives, although Newsom has not been charged with any crime.
Gavin Newsom lashes out at reporter after he asks him about missing tax returns
pic.twitter.com/8Zh50XdZpW— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) July 10, 2026
His office has also pushed back against reports linking former state official Alexis Podesta to Newsom’s inner political circle, arguing media accounts have overstated that relationship.
Despite Newsom previously stating that he expected to receive subpoenas and that he “looked forward” to doing so, no subpoenas have been publicly disclosed, Red State reported.
The DoJ has not announced any charges involving Newsom or his wife, and the governor’s office continues to maintain that the investigation is politically motivated while declining to provide additional details about the federal inquiry.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.
