Sen. Roger Wicker has drawn criticism from some Trump supporters after publicly cautioning President Donald Trump against pursuing a negotiated settlement with Iran, arguing that the administration should “finish the job” rather than enter into talks with Tehran.
Wicker, a Mississippi Republican who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, made the remarks as Trump administration officials reported progress in diplomatic efforts aimed at ending the conflict with Iran and restoring normal shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
Advertisement
Wicker’s public criticism put him at odds with Trump’s strategy of pursuing a diplomatic resolution after the administration used U.S. military force against Iranian nuclear and military targets:
Since day one, I have supported President Trump’s efforts to end Iran’s 47-year threat to the United States and our partners. I am concerned that the memorandum of understanding negotiates away the victories of Operation Epic Fury in ways that are completely out of step with the President’s goals.
Specifically, the $300 billion fund for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran – though not funded by U.S. taxpayers – would make Iran’s payoff under President Obama’s 2015 deal look like a pittance by comparison.
I believe it would be an error to force Israel to stand down against Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed terrorist organization that continues to attack Israel on its northern border.
Advertisement
I also oppose the U.S. lifting any sanctions on Iran, or unfreezing Iranian funds, in exchange for Iran’s mere agreement to negotiate for another 60 days. The Iranian regime has not renounced its ultimate goal — “Death to America, Death to Israel.” The regime will invest every penny it receives to further that aim.
President Trump has pursued peace through strength. I hope the intermediaries working on this deal are not undermining that objective.
The dispute underscored a growing divide within the Republican Party between Trump’s America First approach, which combines military pressure with diplomatic negotiations, and more hawkish Republicans who favor continuing military operations against Iran.
Trump has repeatedly stated that Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon, while also emphasizing that he would prefer a negotiated agreement if Tehran is willing to accept terms that safeguard U.S. interests and regional security.
White House officials have dismissed the claim that Trump was making a weak deal with Iran.
“Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon, and while President Trump always prefers a diplomatic solution, he has been clear about the consequences if Iran refuses to make a deal,” one official said.
The official added that Trump remains in control of the negotiations after the U.S. and Israel militaries destroyed most of Iran’s offensive capabilities.
“As the President stated, he will only make a good deal for the American people,” the official continued. “He is not going to be rushed into making a bad deal.
“Due to the successes of Operation Epic Fury, Economic Fury, and the blockade, President Trump holds the cards and has all the time he needs to make the best deal for the United States and the world,” the official went on.
Wicker released his statement shortly after Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that talks with Iran had shown some movement. Rubio did caution, however, that no final agreement had been reached.
“There’s been some progress,” Rubio said Thursday. “I wouldn’t exaggerate it. I wouldn’t diminish it.”
“We’re not there yet,” Rubio added. “I hope we get there.”
“The issue of highly enriched uranium has to be discussed. Its disposition has to be dealt with. And of course, the issue of future enrichment has to be dealt with as well,” Rubio added.
The Strait of Hormuz remains a central issue in the broader negotiations, with the Trump administration seeking to restore normal traffic through the strategic waterway after the conflict disrupted global energy markets and heightened concerns about a broader economic impact.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.
