The House chamber descended into a shouting match Wednesday after Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio) accused Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) of advancing positions that he argued would benefit terrorist organizations, including Hezbollah.
The confrontation unfolded during a contentious debate over a resolution seeking to compel President Donald Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from Lebanon.
Advertisement
Tlaib, a prominent left-wing member of the Squad, has championed the measure, arguing that the United States should not be involved in supporting Israel’s military operations in Lebanon.
The proposal is expected to receive a floor vote after Tlaib invoked procedures to force congressional consideration of the measure.
Republicans sharply criticized the resolution, noting that it does not specifically reference Hezbollah, the Iran-backed terrorist organization that wields significant influence in Lebanon and has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the United States.
“Hezbollah is a terrorist organization … and its members are butchers that you like to hang out with to a certain extent,” Miller said on the House floor Wednesday evening, in reference to Tlaib.
When the Michigan Democrat responded by screaming at him, Miller responded: “Are we getting a little emotional?”
Advertisement
She responded then by claiming, “That is an attack on my character,” and demanded that Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., the presiding chair, move to rule that Miller’s remarks were out of order.
Obernolte ultimately removed the Ohio lawmaker’s remarks from the official record after House proceedings were halted for more than an hour for discussions among lawmakers.
As a result, Miller was prohibited from speaking on the House floor for the remainder of Wednesday.
Following this, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast, a Republican from Florida, delivered a statement on Miller’s behalf.
“Yes, I said it. I own it, and I stand by it,” Mast said, reading Miller’s statement.
The confrontation escalated further when Mast sought to enter documents into the congressional record that he argued were relevant to the debate over Tlaib’s resolution and her positions on Middle East policy.
Tlaib objected to the effort, preventing the materials from being formally entered during the proceedings.
Among the documents Mast attempted to introduce was a 2023 Fox News report noting that Tlaib had been a member of a private Facebook group in which participants posted messages praising Hamas following the terrorist organization’s Oct. 7 attack on Israel.
Tlaib’s resolution calling for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Lebanon appears headed for defeat on the House floor, where opposition has emerged from both Republicans and a number of Democrats.
The proposal has exposed divisions within the Democratic caucus, and House Democratic leadership has not publicly signaled how it will vote.
GOP lawmakers contend that American forces play an important role in protecting the U.S. Embassy in Beirut and supporting the Lebanese Armed Forces as they work to contain extremist threats.
During floor debate, Republicans repeatedly pressed supporters of the resolution on what would happen if U.S. personnel and assistance were withdrawn.
Mast challenged one of the measure’s co-sponsors, Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), on whether she supported maintaining an American military presence to help train Lebanese forces in operations targeting Hezbollah.
“He’s having a different debate here,” Ramirez claimed, per Fox News.
The House of Representatives voted Wednesday to approve a war powers resolution aimed at ending U.S. involvement in the conflict with Iran.
The move marks the most significant congressional challenge yet to President Donald Trump’s management of the war.
The measure passed 215-208, with four Republicans joining Democrats to form a bipartisan majority in support of the resolution.
The vote followed weeks of political maneuvering on Capitol Hill.
House leadership had originally planned to consider the measure two weeks earlier, but postponed action after it became apparent that enough Republicans were prepared to join Democrats to secure its passage.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.
