Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,
A federal judge on Monday blocked the USDA from restricting the use of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to buy sugary foods or drinks in five states.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued the ruling in response to a lawsuit by five SNAP recipients challenging the Agriculture Department’s (USDA’s) issuance of waivers for Colorado, Iowa, West Virginia, Tennessee, and Nebraska that allow them to restrict certain types of foods that can be purchased under the program.
According to the court documents, the states sought USDA approval between April and August 2025 to conduct pilot projects that would waive the federal definition of food and exclude soft drinks and sugary food from SNAP benefits.
The USDA approved the requests, but the plaintiffs argued the agency lacked authority to approve the food restriction waivers.
In her ruling, Jackson said the USDA lacked congressional approval to waive the federal definition of food under the program.
“Congress defined what ‘food’ is supposed to be, and it did not authorize the agency to amend or waive the definition it enacted. It did not authorize the agency to cut types of food out of SNAP entirely,” the judge said.
“It set out clearly the type of experimental projects that could be tested to address the unquestionably serious health issues attributed to the rise of obesity in the population in general and particularly the low-income population. But it did not invite the Secretary to ignore its directives by trying to advance those ends under the banner of ‘efficiency’ or administrative improvements.”
The judge also said that while the federal government and states may seek to encourage healthier choices for SNAP households, they must do so through lawful steps.
Following the ruling, the USDA defended the move and signaled that it would continue pursuing restrictions on the use of SNAP benefits for certain foods.
“The idea that taxpayer funds should not be used to purchase junk food should not be controversial,” a USDA spokesperson said in a statement. “USDA will not be backing down from the fight to Make America Healthy Again, including for families and communities reliant on SNAP.”
Katie Deabler, senior attorney at the National Center for Law and Economic Justice, which represents the plaintiffs, said the ruling marked “a major step” in restoring essential food aid to SNAP households.
“This decision makes clear that the USDA cannot bypass the legal guardrails that establish how SNAP must operate across the country. It affirms that families deserve a program that works without confusion,” Deabler said in a statement.
The USDA has so far approved food restriction waivers in 23 states, allowing them to restrict SNAP participants from using their benefits to buy products such as soda and candy.
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have supported banning food items deemed unhealthy from SNAP as part of the Make America Healthy Again agenda.
In June 2025, Kennedy called on all state governors to exclude sugary drinks from the SNAP program.
“Taxpayer dollars should never bankroll products that fuel the chronic disease epidemic,” he said at the time.
Naveen Athrappully and Reuters contributed to this report.
