The Republican-led Senate has advanced a significant funding package for immigration enforcement.
However, there’s a kicker.
Senate Republicans only advanced the immigration package after forcing the Trump administration to abandon a controversial settlement fund and stripping a separate White House security proposal from the legislation.
Advertisement
Senators voted 53-46 to begin debate on the roughly $70 billion measure, which would provide funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol.
The bill had been delayed for weeks as Senate Republicans worked through concerns that several provisions had raised, which threatened support within their own conference.
“Right now, the goal is to get the base bill across the finish line,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said.
The biggest point of contention involved a proposed $1.776 billion settlement fund connected to a lawsuit President Donald Trump brought against the IRS over the disclosure of his tax returns.
The fund sparked intense opposition from Senate Republicans after concerns emerged that some recipients could include January 6 defendants and other Trump allies.
Advertisement
After weeks of backlash, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told House lawmakers Tuesday that the administration would abandon the proposal.
“We are not moving forward with the fund, period,” Blanche said.
That assurance helped clear a path for the immigration legislation to move forward, though Democrats remain skeptical and are pushing amendments that would permanently prohibit any future version of the fund.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., warned that Republicans should not rely solely on verbal promises.
“It is only a matter of time before Blanche and Trump go back on their word,” Schumer said Wednesday.
Shortly after the Senate vote, Trump appeared to leave the door open to the idea of revisiting the settlement.
When asked by reporters whether the fund was dead or merely paused, Trump replied, “I’d have to ask the lawyers, I don’t know.”
“I love it,” Trump added. “I think it’s so important.”
Those comments immediately fueled Democratic efforts to force votes on amendments blocking the proposal.
Schumer later posted on X that Trump’s remarks demonstrated exactly why Democrats wanted the ban written into law.
Some Republicans share those concerns.
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., has announced plans to offer an amendment that would prevent any future attempt to revive the settlement fund.
“We’ve got a sufficient number of Republicans who have been very clear they’ve got concerns there,” Tillis said.
Thune acknowledged that keeping all 53 Senate Republicans together remains critical.
“Keep in mind, we’ve got to keep them all together, make sure we’ve got 50 votes for it,” he said.
Another controversial provision was also removed from the legislation.
Republicans stripped approximately $1 billion in funding that had been designated for White House security projects, including President Trump’s proposed ballroom expansion.
The proposal drew criticism from Democrats and some Republicans who questioned whether taxpayer dollars should fund such projects during a period of economic pressure for many Americans.
With those issues largely addressed, Republican leaders are attempting to refocus attention on what they view as the bill’s primary purpose: funding immigration enforcement operations.
Republicans have argued that additional resources for ICE and Border Patrol are necessary as Democrats continue opposing the administration’s immigration crackdown.
The legislation is moving through the Senate using the budget reconciliation process, allowing Republicans to pass it without Democratic support if they can maintain party unity.
A lengthy amendment process is expected to begin Thursday, with both parties preparing for a series of politically charged votes.
Meanwhile, House Republicans are preparing for the possibility of taking up the measure later this week.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said Republican leaders are discussing next steps and monitoring Senate progress, The Associated Press reported.
“We just need to make sure everybody’s there,” Scalise said.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.
