The U.S. Senate showed a rare display of bipartisanship this week that does not happen often.
The Senate unanimously approved the Common Cents Act, a practical measure that formally ends production of the money-losing penny and gives the Treasury Department authority to develop a cheaper nickel.
Advertisement
The move, many argue, will potentially save taxpayers millions while simplifying everyday cash purchases for American consumers and small businesses.
The legislation, which already cleared the House earlier, advanced by unanimous consent.
It targets three long-standing problems with U.S. coinage that have quietly drained public resources and created headaches at checkout counters nationwide.
Advertisement
First, the bill officially terminates the minting of circulating pennies.
The U.S. Mint already produced its final one-cent coins for general circulation last year, though special collectible versions marking America’s 250th anniversary entered circulation earlier this year.
Under the new measure, the Federal Reserve must work to minimize any remaining supply disruptions.
Advertisement
Existing pennies stay fully legal tender—Americans still hold an estimated 300 billion of them, or more than 800 per person—so no one loses the value of coins already in their pockets, jars, or couches.
The second major provision addresses the real-world confusion that has grown since pennies stopped flowing to retailers.
Businesses would gain the clear legal option to round cash transactions to the nearest nickel.
A purchase totaling $19.82 would round down to $19.80, while $19.83 would round up to $19.85.
This voluntary approach applies only to cash deals, leaving credit cards, mobile payments, and checks unaffected.
Advocates note that some states and localities currently ban the practice, creating a patchwork of rules that frustrates both store owners and customers.
The Common Cents Act would preempt those restrictions and restore common sense at the register.
Perhaps most important for fiscal conservatives, the legislation tackles the chronically unprofitable nickel.
Producing a single five-cent coin cost taxpayers 13.31 cents in fiscal year 2025—down only slightly from 13.78 cents the year before.
Advertisement
That marks two full decades of the government losing money on every nickel it strikes. The coin is roughly 75 percent copper, and soaring metal prices have driven the losses, just as they once did for the penny.
The bill empowers the Treasury to test and evaluate a more affordable alternative recipe. Both the House and Senate versions call for a “composition of zinc and nickel” for the coin, “subject to testing and evaluation” that shows it cuts cost and “has a minimal adverse impact on machines designed to accept coins.”
Zinc traded nearly $7,000 per metric ton cheaper than copper last year, according to Mint data.
Only the penny and the dollar coin currently use zinc in significant amounts.
Advertisement
Officials stress that any new formula must still work smoothly in vending machines, parking meters, and coin counters that millions of businesses rely on.
A separate proposal to eliminate the nickel remains stuck in a House committee, so the five-cent piece will continue circulating for now.
The Common Cents Act wisely focuses on making the existing coin cheaper rather than rushing to abolish it.
If the president signs the measure into law, Americans can expect fewer pointless government losses on coin production and smoother cash payments in stores.
Retailers will no longer face conflicting local rules about rounding, and the Treasury will finally have tools to redesign the nickel without waiting for another two decades of red ink.
Advertisement
The unanimous Senate vote signals that even in a polarized Congress, lawmakers can still agree on basic fiscal responsibility.
Cutting waste on coins that cost more to make than they are worth is the kind of straightforward reform that benefits every taxpayer, small-business owner, and cash-paying customer.
The Common Cents Act delivers exactly that—practical solutions without the usual Washington drama.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.
